This
isn’t Jericho and there are no indications that Joshua or ram’s horns were
involved but one thing is certain – last night between 12:30am and 7:00am this
morning the walls did indeed come tumbling down. And not for the first time.
But let me start at the beginning.
I’ve
written several posts recently about new housing construction in Chiclayo. In conjunction
with that activity is the buying, selling and leasing of existing housing. ‘For
sale’ and ‘for rent’ signs in windows are a common sight these days. This is a
fairly recent phenomenon. It used to be that if you were looking for a home or
apartment, word of mouth is how you found it. Realtors do exist in Chiclayo but
they are not nearly as visible as those in the USA, nor do Chiclayanos utilize
their services, viewing a middle-man as money spent for nothing.
Occasionally
a ‘for sale’ sign will include this verbiage – ‘this property is in litigation.’
That could mean that there are back taxes owed or there is some other problem
with the city, but more likely it means that the property ownership is in
dispute. Such is the case with a
property in our neighborhood.
The
most common version of the story circulating is that an old man who does not
own the property but through some shenanigan managed to get his name registered
as the owner sold the property to an unsuspecting buyer. When the new owner
attempted to physically secure the property the real owner found out and filed
suit. A judge arrived at a decision and appointed a specific day to announce
his verdict. In situations like this it
is customary for the judge to announce his decision at the site of the dispute
with all interested parties present, including a number of police to protect
the judge in the event that the loser takes violent exception to the verdict.
One
morning several months ago the litigants assembled outside the property. These
things tend to take on a festive atmosphere and a crowd of neighbors, mototaxi
drivers and others had assembled, along with street vendors hoping to take
advantage of the situation. Several hours later the crowd dispersed after word
was received that the judge had postponed his decision indefinitely because of a
missing document.
Last
week one of the parties – we don’t know who, had two brick walls constructed to
close off the property which consists of three lots. The middle lot has a small
unoccupied house on it so the walls were constructed on the two outside lots to
match the height of the house. A two-man crew accomplished the work in one
day. That night a person or persons unknown demolished the walls, providing a topic
of much conversation the next day. Neighbors could not agree on who might have
done it, with opinions ranging from one of the litigants to a random act of
vandalism to the work crew itself hoping for another payday. The crew did
return the next day and rebuilt the walls. Two days later the walls were
painted yellow to match the house. We assumed that was the end of that issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment